Petitioner sought mandamus to compel registration authorities to dispose of a pending petition, but court dismissed writ as infructuous upon counsel's submission.
Petitioner's prayer to direct respondents to dispose of a 2012 petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.12.2020
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.18443 of 2013
R.Dhanalakshmi Ravi ... Petitioner
Vs. 1.The State rep by The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai – 4.
2.The District Registrar, Kanchipuram Registration District, Kanchipuram.
3.The Sub Registrar, O/o The Sub Registrar, Sriperumputhur, Kanchipuram District. 4.S.K.Raju ... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 & 2 to dispose of the petition dated 28.08.2012 preferred by the petitioner at the earliest.
For Petitioner : Ms.S.S.Jhothivani
For Respondents: Mr.P.Purushothaman, Government Advocate (R1 to R3)
Ms.S.S.Jhothivani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Page numbers
va
Page numbers
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R. Dhanalakshmi Ravi
The State rep by The Inspector General of Registration
The District Registrar, Kanchipuram
The Sub Registrar, Sriperumputhur
S.K. Raju
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
