Disposed

K.Jagadeesan v. the Union of India

Madras HC14 Dec 2020WP/16896/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Four writ petitions were filed seeking a writ of mandamus to direct Southern Railway officials to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.05.2020 regarding lease license fees and pandemic impacts. The bench directed the Fourth Respondent to affording an opportunity for personal or virtual hearing and to pass orders within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

The Fourth Respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.05.2020 by affording an opportunity of personal or virtual hearing and to fix a date of hearing on 28.12.2020.

K.Jagadeesan Vs the Union of India — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 14.12.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA

¶5

W.P.Nos.16896,16905, 16907 and 16909 of 2020 and W.M.P.Nos.20963, 20973, 20977 and 20981 of 2020

¶6

K.Jagadeesan ... Petitioner in all W.Ps.
Vs.
1. The Union of India,
Represented by its Principal Secretary,
Ministry of Railways,
Rail Bhawan, New Delhi.
2. The Railway Board,
Represented by its Chairman,
Rail Bhawan, New Delhi.
3. The General Manager,
O/o.The General Manager,
Southern Railway,
Park Town,
Chennai – 3.
4. The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager,
O/o.The General Manager,
Southern Railway,
Park Town,
Chennai – 3.
5. The Chief Commercial Manager,
Souther Railway,
Park Town, Chennai – 3.
6. The Divisional Railway Manager,
Madras Zone, Southern Railway,
Park Town, Chennai – 3. .. Respondents in all W.Ps.

¶7

1 of 4

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

COMMON PRAYER: The Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to directing the respondent Nos.3 to 6 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.05.2020 and dispose of the same within a reasonable time frame fixed by this court before implementing the propagation contemplated in the second respondent's letter No.2020-TG.IV/18/Misc/Comml Contracts dated 07.09.2020.

¶10

For Petitioner in all W.Ps. : Mr.V.R.Kamalanathan For Respondents in all W.Ps. : Mr.P.T.Ramkumar - - - - - C O M M O N O R D E R

¶11

The present Writ Petitions have been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct respondent Nos.3 to 6 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.05.2020 and dispose of the same within a reasonable time that may be fixed by this court before implementing the propagation contemplated in the second respondent's letter No.2020-TG.IV/18/ Misc/Comml Contracts dated 07.09.2020.

¶12

The petitioner is one and the same in all the Writ Petitions. He was the successful tenderer for manning the Cycle/Scooter Parking Stand at Tiruninravur Site 2, Tiruvallur, Annanur and Saipapet (East) Railway Stations. In all the matters, the lease period ended on 12.03.2020, 18.06.2020, 08.11.2020 and 18.04.2020, respectively. Due to out break of the pandemic, there was a total lockdown and there were no trains being operated as there was a complete stoppage. The petitioner's business of manning the parking stand is also affected as there was no passenger.

¶13

In the meanwhile, the second respondent had sent a communication dated 07.09.2020, as per which, 90 days relaxation in lincense fees was granted to the existing commercial earning operational contracts viz., Parking, pay and use toilets, STD/PCO booth, ATM, etc., treating the period between 25.03.2020 and 22.06.2020 as “dies-non”. Further, relief in charging the license fee after the said period may be considered by the Zonal

¶14

2 of 4

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

Railways under the existing terms and conditions of contracts which provide for addition/ modification/review in existing agreement with mutual consent, with concurrence of Finance. After receiving the above-said communication, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition.

¶17

The representation in all the matters were sent by the petitioner dated 29.05.2020 mooting certain proposals which would include keeping implementation of revised parking fees in abeyance and consider the implementation of the revised parking fees for the existing contractors and permit the contractors, who had already completed their contracts to remove the shed used for parking, which had been erected out of their personal funds and refund all amounts withheld by the Railways on account of payment of GST, etc., and also revoke the Bank Guarantee given for Security Deposit and replace the same by reducing it 10% and other demands.

¶18

The learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the closure notices were issued on 19.10.2020. He would further submit that in all the above matters, the lease period has come to an end long back. In W.P.No.16896 of 2020, which relates to Tiruninravur, the lease period expired as early as on 12.03.2020 before the pandemic national wide lockdown was announced. As it consents, the same person for different contracts, let the representation of the petitioner be considered by the respondents.

¶19

De-hors the fact that the closure notices were issued, the fourth respondent/Senior Divisional Commercial Manager is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.05.2020 by affording him an opportunity of personal hearing or virtual hearing and consider the same on merits. The fourth respondent is directed to fix a date of hearing on 28.12.2020 and pass orders within a period of two (2) weeks thereafter. The petitioner is directed to appear before the fourth respondent on that day to make his submissions.

¶20

3 of 4

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

/true copy/

Sub Asst. Registrar

asi

To 1. The Principal Secretary, Union of India, Ministry of Railways, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi. 2. The Railway Board, Represented by its Chairman, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. The General Manager, O/o.The General Manager, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai – 3.

¶29

The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, O/o.The General Manager, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai – 3. 5. The Chief Commercial Manager, Souther Railway, Park Town, Chennai – 3. 6. The Divisional Railway Manager, Madras Zone, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai – 3.

¶30

+1 cc to P.T.Ramkumar Advocate sr40914

¶31

W.P.Nos.16896,16905, 16907 and 16909 of 2020 and W.M.P.Nos.20963, 20973, 20977 and 20981 of 2020 aa21/12/2020

¶32

4 of 4

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Jagadeesan v. the Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Jagadeesan v. the Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.P.Velumani Vs Joint Director/Assistant Director

RamanathSriram Vs The Union of India

N.Maragathavalli Vidhya Vs The Registrar of Birth and Death

A.Balasubramaniyan Vs The Director of Medical and Rural Health Services

M.Sankarappa Vs the District Collector

Mr.M.K.Dhanraj, Vs the Commissioner