The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to direct the second respondent to consider a petition regarding seigniorage fee. The matter was listed for withdrawal by the petitioner. This court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.12.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
W.P.No.9027 of 2020
K.P.Velumani ..Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the petition dated 29.11.2019 to receive the seigniorage fee from the petitioner within a time fixed by this Court.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a Memo dated 01.12.2020 before the Registry seeking to list the matter before this Court under the caption “for withdrawal”. Accordingly, the matter is listed today under the same caption.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Joint Director/Asst.Director(i/c),
Department of Geology and Mines,
District Collector Campus,
Coimbatore District,
Coimbatore.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
State Bank Road,
Coimbatore-18.
3. The Sub Inspector of Police,
Chettipalayam Police Station,
Chettipalayam,
Coimbatore District.
W.P.No.9027 of 2020
ad(CO)
rv(06/01/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.P.Velumani
The Joint Director/Asst.Director(i/c), Department of Geology and Mines
The Revenue Divisional Officer
The Sub Inspector of Police
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
