Disposed

S.Lakshmikantha, v. The District Collector

Madras HC28 Sept 2020WP/13273/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Tahsildar to survey land, fix boundary stones, and issue a patta after ignoring the petitioner's representation.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.09.2020, conduct a survey, fix boundary stones, and issue a decision within four weeks.

S.Lakshmikantha, Vs The District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 28.09.2020

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

W.P.No.13273 of 2020

S.Lakshmikantha

...Petitioner

Vs.

1 The District Collector Master Plan Complex

¶10

NH 205 Chennai Tiruttani Highway Thiruvallur 602001.

¶11

2 The Tahsildar J.N.Road N.H.716 Thiruvallur Thiruvallur District. ...Respondents

¶12

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to sub-divide the portion of land purchased by the petitioner in Sr.No.453/2 for 7.25 cents (3145 Sq.ft) and issue patta for the land bearing No.5, Moorai Village, Avadi Taluk, Tiruvallur District.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ilamvaludhi

¶14

For Respondents: Mr.K.Parameshwaran Government Advocate

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This Writ Petition has been filed for the issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 01.09.2020 and to conduct a survey in the subject property and lay the boundary stones and also to issue patta.

¶17

The case of the petitioner is that the subject property belongs to the petitioner absolutely and the petitioner has been approaching the second respondent to get the property surveyed and to fix the boundary stones. A representation was made in this regard on 01.09.2020. Since the same was not considered, the present Writ Petition has been filed before this Court seeking for appropriate directions.

¶18

Heard Mr.S.Ilamvaludhi, learned counsel for the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner and Mr.K.Parameshwaran, learned Government Advocate

¶19

for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.

¶20

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited relief sought for by the petitioner, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 01.09.2020 and act upon the same and take a decision strictly in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall also pay the necessary fees for the purpose of conducting the survey. The petitioner is directed to make fresh representation to the second respondent along with a copy of the representation dated 01.09.2020 and all necessary documents and also a copy of this order.

¶21

This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above
directions. No costs.
mra
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1 The District Collector
Master Plan Complex
NH 205 Chennai Tiruttani Highway
Thiruvallur 602001.
2 The Tahsildar
J.N.Road
N.H.716 Thiruvallur
Thiruvallur District.
+1cc to Mr.S.Ilamvaludhi , Advocate SR.No. 31620
W.P.No.13273 of 2020
A.SK(03/11/2020)

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Lakshmikantha, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Lakshmikantha, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Nithyanathan Vs The District Collector

Dr. Syed Thahir Hussain Vs R. Narayanababu

S. Manikandan Vs P. Kannappan

M.Palanisamy Vs The Commissioner of Land Administration

K.Sarojadevi Vs The District collector

Gopinath(Id No. H319036) Vs State of Tamil Nadu