Dismissed

Dr. Syed Thahir Hussain v. R. Narayanababu

Madras HC25 Sept 2020CONT P/571/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses a contempt petition and two sub-applications filed under Sections 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act and 151 CPC. The Court held that since the impugned orders had been complied with, the presence of respondents was dispensed with, and all pending proceedings were closed without punishment.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition and all sub-applications were closed; presence of respondents was dispensed with; no punishment imposed.

Dr. Syed Thahir Hussain Vs R. Narayanababu — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 25.09.2020

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

Contempt Petition No.571 of 2020 and Sub.Appl.Nos.289 & 353 of 2020

¶7

Dr.Syed Thahir Hussain ...Petitioner in Contempt Petition/ Sub Application No.289/2020 and 1^st Respondent in Sub Appl.No.353/2020

¶8

¶9

Dr.R.Narayanababu, Director of Medical Education, Directorate of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. ...1^st Respondent in Contempt Petition /Sub Application No.289/2020 and Applicant in Sub Appl. No.353/2020

¶10

Dr.Gurunathan,

¶11

Director, Director of Medical and Rural Health Services, Teynampet, Chennai-6.

¶12

^nd Respondent in Contempt Petition & Sub Appl. No.289/2020 and 353/2020

¶13

Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondents for Contempt of Court for having deliberately violating the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 28.02.2020 in W.P.No.32730 of 2019.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

¶16

Sub Application No.289 of 2020 filed under Section 151 CPC to

¶17

dispense with the production of the order copy in W.P.No.32720 of 2019

¶18

dated 28.02.2020.

¶19

Sub Application No.353 of 2020 filed under Section 151 CPC to
dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner on 25.09.2020 order
dated 03.09.2020 made in Contempt Petition No.571 of 2020 in
W.P.No.32730 of 2019.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Gowthaman
For Respondent : Mr.M.Elumalai
Govt. Advocate
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders

¶20

passed by this Court has been complied with.

¶21

Even though this Court insisted for the appearance of the

¶22

respondents, in view of the fact that the order has been complied with, the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

¶24

presence of the respondents is dispensed with and the Contempt Petition is

¶25

closed. The Sub applications are also closed.

¶26

SD/-

¶27

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)
rli
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2020.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25 th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of
the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
SMI/16/11/2020
To
1. The Director of Medical Education,
Directorate of Medical Education,
Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010.
2. The Director, Director of Medical and Rural
Health Services,
Teynampet, Chennai-6.

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Dr. Syed Thahir Hussain v. R. Narayanababu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Syed Thahir Hussain v. R. Narayanababu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Sundaravadivelu, Vs The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies

C.Selvi Vs The chairman

S.Duraisamy Vs The District Collector

D.Velu Vs The District Collector

M.Kannan Vs The District Collector

M/s. Bsr Mall Vs Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution