S. Manikandan v. P. Kannappan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court court found that the order in the writ petition passed in W.P.No.34036 of 2019 had been complied with by the respondents. The contempt petition was consequently closed.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed without any punishment.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.09.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Contempt Petition No.738 of 2020
S.Manikandan ...Petitioner
Vs
1. Mr.P.Kannappan,
Director of School Education,
DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-6.
2. Mr.Thiyagarajan
Chief Educational Officer,
Tiruvarur District, Tiruvarur.
3. Mr.S.Adhi Ramasubu,
District Educational Officer,
Tiruvarur Educational District,
Tiruvarur District.
4. Mrs.R.Shanthi Ranganathan,
Secretary,
T.T.Narasimhan Swamy Dayanandha
Higher Secondary School,
Manjagudi, Tiruvarur District.
...Respondents
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts
Act to punish the Respondents for wilfully disobeying the orders passed in
W.P.No.34036 of 2019 dated 05.12.2019.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sankaran For Respondent : Mrs.V.Annalakshmi Govt. Advocate
2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners have willfully disobeyed the orders of this court passed in W.P.No.34036 of 2019.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Manikandan
- respondent
Mr. P. Kannappan
- respondent
Mr. Thiyagarajan
- respondent
Mr. S. Adhi Ramasubu
- respondent
Mrs. R. Shanthi Ranganathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court