Dismissed

M.Thangavelu v. The secretary to government

Madras HC17 Sept 2020WP/10147/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Madras, vide an order dated 17.09.2020, granted permission to the petitioners to withdraw three writ petitions filed under Article 226. The petitions sought declarations that land acquisition proceedings had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the LARR Act, 2013. The court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn with no costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ petitions. Petitions dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petitions also dismissed.

M.Thangavelu Vs The secretary to government — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 17.09.2020

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶5

W.P.Nos.10147, 10107 & 10109 of 2020 and WMP.Nos.12289,12287,12292,12293 & 12339 of 2020

¶6

M.Thangavelu ... Petitioner
S/o.Late Mayilsamy. in W.P.No.10147 of 2020
1.Parvathi,
W/o.Kanagaraj.
2.Mayilathal,
W/o.Pechimuthu.
3.Alamathal,
W/o.Ayyasamy
4.Vellatthal,
W/o.Ramasamy. ...Petitioners
in W.P.No.10107 of 2020
1.Thiruvenkatasamy,
S/o.Late Ramasamy.
2.R.Renganathan,
S/o.Late Ramasamy.
3.Subbathal,
D/o.Late Ramasamy.
4.Palaniammal, ... Petitioners
W/o.Late Ramasamy. in W.P.No.10109 of 2020
Vs.
1.The Secretary to Government,
Public Works Department,
Secretariat, Fort St.George,
Chennai 600 009.
2.The District Collector,
Collectorate Complex,
Coimbatore-18.

¶7

Page numbers

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

3.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Complex, Coimbatore-18.

¶10

4.The Special District Revenue Officer(Land Acquisition) National Highways No.47,67 and 209, Coimbatore. ...4^th respondent in W.P.No.10147 of 2020

¶11

5.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Collectorate Complex, Coimbatore-18.

¶12

6.The Special Tahsildar (LA), National Highways, Collectorate Complex, Coimbatore-18.

¶13

7.The Tahsildar, Madukkarai Taluk, Coimbatore District. ... Respondents in all W.Ps. W.P.No.10147 of 2020: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking Writ of Declaration, declaring the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the respondents 1 and 6 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in respect of the lands belonging to the petitioner comprised in S.No.353/1 of an extent of acre 1.00 cents, situated in Vellalore Village, Coimbatore District, become lapsed, by virtue of the operation of the provisions contained in Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Re-settlement Act, (Act 30/2013) and as per the communication of the 4^th respondent dated 03.03.2020 and consequently directing the 6^th respondent to enter the name of the petitioner in the revenue records.

¶14

W.P.No.10107 of 2020: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking Writ of Declaration, declaring the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the respondents 1 and 5 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in respect of the lands belonging to the petitioner comprised in S.No.353/2 of an extent of acre 1.25 cents, situated in Vellalore Village, Coimbatore District, become lapsed, by virtue of the operation of the provisions contained in Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Re-settlement Act, (Act 30/2013) and consequently directing the 6^th respondent to enter the name of the petitioner in the revenue records.

¶15

W.P.No.10109 of 2020: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking Writ of Declaration, declaring

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Page numbers

¶17

the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the respondents 1 and 5 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in respect of the lands belonging to the petitioner comprised in S.No.353/1 of an extent of acre 1.10 cents, situated in Vellalore Village, Coimbatore District, become lapsed, by virtue of the operation of the provisions contained in Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Re-settlement Act, (Act 30/2013) and consequently directing the 6^th respondent to enter the name of the petitioner in the revenue records.

¶18

When these writ petitions are taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners sought permission of this court to withdraw the petitions.

¶19

2.These matters were heard through video conference, therefore no endorsement is made in the bundle.

¶20

3.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, permission is granted to withdraw the case and accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are dismissed.

¶21

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Rm To

¶22

1.The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

¶23

2.The District Collector, Collectorate Complex, Coimbatore-18.

¶24

3.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Complex, Coimbatore-18.

¶25

Page numbers

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

4.The Special District Revenue Officer(Land Acquisition) National Highways No.47,67 and 209, Coimbatore.

¶28

5.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Collectorate Complex,
Coimbatore-18.
6.The Special Tahsildar (LA),
National Highways, Collectorate Complex,
Coimbatore-18.
7.The Tahsildar,
Madukkarai Taluk,
Coimbatore District.
+1cc to the Government Pleader SR.30522
W.P.Nos.10147, 10107 & 10109 of 2020
LN(CO)
CB(21/10/2020)

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

Page numbers

M.Thangavelu v. The secretary to government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Thangavelu v. The secretary to government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

L.Rajendiran, Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

K.Venkatesh Vs Jothi Nirmalasamy

G.Anthony Vs The District Collector

Opg Power Generation Pvt. Ltd. Vs Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution

Opg Power Generation Pvt. Ltd. Vs Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution

J.Jackson, Vs The Commissioner