R.Karthikeyan v. Sri Arulmighu Arunachaleswarar
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on the scheduled listing dates without representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.01.2020
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
SA.No.884 of 2000 and CMP.No.8058 of 2000
R.Karthikeyan ..Appellant/2nd Defendant Vs. 1.Sri Arulmighu Arunasalaswarar Devasthanam, Thiruvannamalai by its Executive Officer 2.R.Balasubramaniyan 3.Dr.Shanmuga Sundari 4.Sivasankari ..Respondents/Plaintiff & Defendants 3 to 5 PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 02.08.1999 in A.S.No.76 of 1998 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Thiruvannamalai confirming the judgment and decree dated 27.02.1998 in O.S.No.441 of 1985 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Thiruvannamalai.
For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : No appearance - not ready in notice
JUDGMENT
The second appeal is directed as against the judgment and decree dated 02.08.1999 in A.S.No.76 of 1998 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Thiruvannamalai confirming the judgment and decree dated 27.02.1998 in O.S.No.441 of 1985 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Thiruvannamalai.
2
Sd/Assistant Registrar
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Additional District Judge,
Thiruvannamalai
2.The Additional District Munsif,
Thiruvannamalai.
Copy to : The Section Officer, V.R.Section,
High Court of Madras, Chennai.
AKM/02.03.2020 /2P-4C/
SA.No.884 of 2000
R.Karthikeyan
Sri Arulmighu Arunasalaswarar Devasthanam, Thiruvannamalai
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court