This second appeal was dismissed as abated against the deceased first respondent and for default against the other respondents, who were not duly impleaded or served with notice.
Second appeal dismissed as abated against the first respondent and for default against respondents 2 and 3.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.01.2020
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
SA.NO.439 OF 2001
Rathina Padayachi ..Appellant/Plaintiff
Vs.
1.Perumal Padayachi
2.Mani
3.Ramasamy Padayachi ..Respondents/Defendants
PRAYER:
The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC against
the judgment and decree dated 02.12.1999 in A.S.No.113 of 1991
on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur, confirming the
judgment and decree dated 29.04.1991 in O.S.No.167 of 1982 on
the file of the District Munsif, Jayankondam.
For Appellant : No Appearance
For Respondents : R1 – died
R2 and R3 – not ready notice
JUDGMENT
The second appeal is directed as against the judgment and decree dated 02.12.1999 in A.S.No.113 of 1991 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur, confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.04.1991 in O.S.No.167 of 1982 on the file of the District Munsif, Jayankondam.
3.Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
lok
To
1. The Subordinate Judge,
Ariyalur
2. The District Munsif,
Jayankondam.
SA.No.439 of 2001
EV(CO)
CS/09/03/2020
Rathina Padayachi
Perumal Padayachi
Mani
Ramasamy Padayachi
G. K. Ilanthiranay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
