Appellate judge dismissed a second appeal under Section 100 CPC for default due to no appearance by the appellant and lack of steps taken despite proper notice after the lead counsel's death. No costs awarded.
Appeal dismissed for default; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.01.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
S.A.No.831 of 1998
Arulmigu Agastheeswarar Devasthanam,
Rep.by its Executive Officer. ..Plaintiff/Appellant/Appellant
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section. 100 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruvallur, passed in A.S.No.94 of 1988 dated 24.01.1994, confirming the Judgment and Decree of the Learned District Munsif, Ponneri passed in O.S.No.359 of 1982 dated 29.02.1988.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellant died. Therefore, notice issued to the appellant and it was duly served. Thereafter, the name of the appellant printed in the cause list and even they did not take any steps to proceed with the matter till today. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar
//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Pns To
1
Copy to: The Record Keeper V.R.Section, High court, Madras-104.
S.A.No.831 of 1998
RP(CO) CB(20/02/2020)
2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arulmigu Agastheeswarar Devasthanam
Appellant's Represntatives
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
