Dismissed
Govindammal v. Paunsamy
Madras HCSA/357/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras allowed a second appeal where the appellant and respondent entered a out-of-court compromise. The court disposed of the appeal by modifying the decree based on the filed memorandum of compromise without costs.
What did the court decide?
A decree was passed in O.S.No.53 of 2012 in terms of the filed memorandum of compromise. No costs. Registry directed to return exhibits after substitution with certified copies.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶2
DATED: 08.10.2020
¶3
CORAM:
¶4
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
¶5
S.A.No. 357 of 2014
¶6
Govindammal...Appellant / Respondent / Plaintiff
Vs.
¶7
Paunsamy..Respondent / Appellant / Defendant
¶8
Prayer: Second appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against
the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.21 of 2013 on the file of
the Sub-Judge, Harur dated 13.12.2013 reversing the judgment and
decree made in O.S.No. 53 of 2012 on the file of the District
Munsif, Harur dated 22.03.2013.
¶9
For Petitioner : Mr.Durai Gunasekaran
¶10
For Respondent : Mr.C.Prabhakaran
¶11
The parties have entered into a compromise. The
memorandum of compromise has also been filed.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Govindammal
- respondent
Paunsamy
Coram
AI extract
R.Subramaniam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court