High Court of Madras dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226/227 as infructuous because the underlying Revision Case Order Petition had already been disposed of. No costs were awarded.
Civil Revision petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP (PD) No.2634 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.10.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
CRP (PD) No.2634 of 2018 and CMP No.15768 of 2018
R.Sheik Abdul Kadhar ... Petitioner
Vs
S.Janakirama Rao ... Respondent
Prayer: The Civil Revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order passed in memo order dated 17.07.2018 in RCOP No.01 of 2018 on the file of the Distict Munsif cum Rent Controller, Arakonam.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Viswanath
For Respondent : Mr.G.Jeremiah
O R D E R
Mr.S.C.Viswanath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
would submit that the Civil Revision petition has become infructuous since
RCOP No.1 of 2018 has been disposed of.
1/2
CRP (PD) No.2634 of 2018
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
vum
having become infructous. No costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
08.10.2020
vum
Index: Yes/No
Speaking order / Non speaking order
To
The Distict Munsif cum Rent Controller,
Arakonam.
CRP (PD) No.2634 of 2018 and
CMP No.15768 of 2018
2/2
R.Sheik Abdul Kadhar
S.Janakirama Rao
R.SUBRAMANIAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
