Allowed

Gopalakrishnan v. Angammal

Madras HC8 Oct 2020SA/1106/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras heard two second appeals under Section 100 CPC filed in 2015 arising from family disputes adjudicated in 2011 and 2014. The appellants sought permission to withdraw both appeals, which the court granted, dismissing the appeals accordingly and closing the connected miscellaneous petition with no costs awarded.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of the two second appeals (S.A. Nos. 1106 and 1107 of 2015) as withdrawn each with no costs.

Gopalakrishnan Vs Angammal — Madras HC (2020) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 08.10.2020 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN S.A.Nos. 1106 & 1107 of 2015 and C.M.P.No. 1363 of 2016

¶4

1.Gopalakrishnan 2.Jagadambal 3.Venkatesan ...Appellants/Respondents/

¶5

Defendants in both appeals

¶6

Vs. 1.Angammal 2.Kalliyappan ..Respondents/Appellants/Plaintiffs in both appeals Prayer in S.A.No. 1106 of 2015: Second appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 20.03.2015 made in A.S.No. 3 of 2014(Tindivanam Sub-Court A.S.No.47/11), on the file of I – Additional District Judge, Tindivanam, in reversing the well considered Jugment and decree dated 29.08.2011 made in O.S.No.224 of 2009, on the file of the Principal Munsif Court, Tindivanam.

¶7

Prayer in S.A.No. 1107 of 2015: Second appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 20.03.2015 made in A.S.No. 3 of 2014 in Cross appeal No.5 of 2015(Tindivanam Sub-Court A.S.No.47/11), on the file of I – Additional District Judge, Tindivanam, in confirming Judgment and decree dated 29.08.2011 made in O.S.No.224 of 2009, on the file of the Principal Munsif Court, Tindivanam.

¶8

For Petitioners in both appeal : Mr.A.Gouthaman For Respondents in both appeals : Mr.N.Suresh for R1

¶9

Mr.A.Gouthaman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would seek permission to withdraw the appeals.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

In view of the same, these appeals are dismissed as
withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscelaneous petition is
closed. No costs.
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
kkn
To:
1. The I – Additional District Judge, Tindivanam.
2. The Principal Munsif Court, Tindivanam.
3.Sub Court Tindivanam
Copy to
The Section Officer
VR Section
High Court Madras-104
+2 ccs to Mr.A.Gowthaman Advocate sr33424,33423
S.A.Nos. 1106 & 1107 of 2015
and
C.M.P.No. 1363 of 2016
JP(co)
aa20/01/2021

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Gopalakrishnan v. Angammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopalakrishnan v. Angammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aamaravathy Vs Abbas Sandhu Mohammed

Murugesan Vs P. Chakravarthi

Karunakaran(Died) Vs N.R.Rajamani

R.Sheik Abdul Kadhar Vs S.Janakiramanrao

Raja Ramalingam Vs Malathi

Govindammal Vs Paunsamy