Kumar v. M.Moorthy
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed a civil revision petition as infructuous because the underlying suit had already been disposed of, concurrently closing the connected miscellaneous petition.
What did the court decide?
Revision dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.
What the court decided
CRP (PD) No.997 of 2018 and CMP. No.5341 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.10.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
CRP (PD) No.997 of 2018 and
CMP No.5341 of 2018
1.Kumar
2.Saravanan ... Petitioners
Vs
M.Moorthy ... Respondent
Prayer: The Civil Revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order in I.A. No.14505 of 2017 in I.A. No.3484 of 2016 in O.S. No.6036 of 2013 on the file of the XV Assistant City Civil Court at Madras dated 12.02.2018.
For Petitioners : Ms.V.Lokeswari for Mr.V.Raghavachari
For Respondent :Mr.J.Kingsly Solomon
1/2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kumar and Saravanan
- respondent
M.Moorthy
Coram
R.Subramanian
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court