Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner had already vacated the suit premises. Connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition also closed. No costs awarded.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition closed; No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(NPD).No.81 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.12.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
C.R.P.(NPD).No.81 of 2017 and
C.M.P.No.437 of 2017
(Through Video Conferencing) Thirumaran @ Saravanan .. Petitioner Vs. Vasanthakumari .. Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C., to number the E.A and to set aside the Fair and Decreetal order dated 05.11.2016 made in unnumbered E.A.No.of 2016 in E.P.No.197 of 2013 in R.C.O.P.No.9 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Cuddalore.
For Petitioner : Mr.I.Jeyaseelan For Respondent : Mr.T.Sezhian
ORDER Mr.T.Sezhian, learned counsel for the Respondent has submitted
that, the learned counsel for the Petitioner informed him, the Petitioner has
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
1/2
C.R.P.(NPD).No.81 of 2017
arb
already vacated the suit premises and hence, this Civil Revision Petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition should be dismissed as infructuous on the grounds that the petitioner has already vacated the suit premises.
Thirumaran @ Saravanan
Vasanthakumari
A.A.Nakkiran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
