The Single Judge dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution as infructuous. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the underlying suit was already dismissed for default, rendering the revision without purpose.
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(PD).No.1177 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.12.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
C.R.P.(PD).No.1177 of 2017
(Through Video Conferencing)
Arunagiri .. Petitioner Vs. Chandrasekaran .. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the Fair and Decreetal order dated 13.02.2017 made in I.A.No.467 of 2016 in O.S.No.149 of 2011 on the file of the Principal District Court, Namakkal.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Baalaji For Respondent : Mr.T.Dhanyakumar
ORDER
The learned counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that since the suit in O.S.No.149 of 2011 had already been dismissed for default on 05.12.2018, this Civil Revision Petition may be dismissed, as infructuous.
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
1/2
C.R.P.(PD).No.1177 of 2017
arb
In view of the same, recording the said submissions of the learned counsel
for the Petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, as infructuous.
No costs.
09.12.2020
arb
Internet: Yes/No
Index:Yes/No
To
The Principal District Court,
Namakkal.
C.R.P.(PD).No.1177 of 2017
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition proceeding under Article 227 of the Constitution should be dismissed as infructuous since the underlying suit had been dismissed for default.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arunagiri
Chandrasekaran
A.A.Nakkiran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
