The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel admitted the underlying suit was disposed of, closing the connected miscellaneous petition.
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed; the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(PD).No.3963 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.12.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
C.R.P.(PD).No.3963 of 2016
and
C.M.P.No.20107 of 2016
(Through Video Conferencing)
1. Krishnaveni
2. Kamatchi
3. Saraswathi
4. Nagalingam
5. Ulaganathan .. Petitioners
Vs.
Kader Kause .. Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the Fair and Final order dated 21.09.2016 made in I.A.No.699 of 2016 in O.S.No.3 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sirkali.
For Petitioners : Mr.S.Sounthar For Respondent : No appearance
ORDER
The learned counsel for the Petitioners has submitted that since
the suit in O.S.No.3 of 2008 had already been disposed of on 10.08.2017,
this Civil Revision Petition may be dismissed, as infructuous. In view of
1/2
C.R.P.(PD).No.3963 of 2016
arb
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
the same, recording the said submissions of the learned counsel for the
Petitioners, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, as infructuous. No
costs. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
09.12.2020
arb
Internet: Yes/No
Index:Yes/No
To
The District Munsif Court,
Sirkali.
C.R.P.(PD).No.3963 of 2016
and
C.M.P.No.20107 of 2016
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to permit a recall petition as infructuous given the disposal of the underlying suit
Krishnaveni
Kamatchi
Saraswathi
Nagalingam
Ulaganathan
Kader Kause
A.A.Nakkiran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
