Allowed

K.Ravikrishnan v. C.Kamalakannan

Madras HC24 Feb 2020CRL RC/308/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a revision against a conviction under Section 138 NI Act compounded by a compromise, the Court accepted the settlement, set aside the conviction and sentence, acquitted the petitioner, cancelled the bail bond, and ordered refund of any fine paid.

What did the court decide?

Compounding of offence under Section 138 NI Act, setting aside conviction and sentence, acquittal of petitioner, cancellation of bail bond, and refund of fine.

K.Ravikrishnan Vs C.Kamalakannan — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.02.2020 CORAM

¶2

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶3

Crl.R.C.No.308 of 2020

¶4

and

¶5

Crl.M.P.Nos.2302 and 2303 of 2020

¶6

K.Ravikrishnan .. Petitioner/ Accused Vs C.Kamalakannan .. Respondent/Complainant

¶7

Prayer:- Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 read with 401 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the entire records in respect of the judgment rendered by the Learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Vellore in C.A.No.121 of 2017 dated 14.03.2019 confirming the Judgment made in C.C.No.58 of 2016 dated 06.11.2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Tract, Vellore and set aside the same.

¶8

For Petitioner :Mr.M.Rajendran For Respondent :Mr.M.G.Ramachandiran

¶9

ORDER

¶10

The revision petitioner is an accused in C.C.No.58 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Vellore. By judgment dated 06.11.2017, he was found guilty under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and convicted for the same and sentenced him to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay the cheque amount as compensation with 6% interest from the date of complaint to the complainant as per section 357 (3) Cr.P.C, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of three months. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner preferred a Criminal Appeal in C.A.No.121/2017 before the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Vellore. By judgment dated 14.03.2019, the Appellate Court dismissed the appeal and thereby confirmed the conviction and sentence passed by the trial Court. Challenging the same, the petitioner is before this Court with this Criminal Revision.

¶11

Today, when the matter was called, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and a compromise petition dated 17.02.2020 signed by both the parties, has also been filed, wherein, at para 3, it is inter alia stated that the petitioner/accused has paid the entire amount of Rs.5,00,000/https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ to the respondent/complainant by way of Demand draft bearing

¶12

No.268277 dated 15.02.2020 drawn in favour of the respondent and the same was also accepted by the respondent/complainant as full and final settlement.

¶13

The learned counsel for the respondent affirms the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶14

Since both the parties have entered into compromise, this Court is of the view that no prejudice would be caused to any of the parties, if the said compromise petition is accepted by this Court. Accordingly, the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is compounded and the conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioner/accused by the trial Court and confirmed by the Appellate Court are set aside. The petitioner is acquitted from the charge levelled against him. The bail bond, if any executed by the petitioner shall stand cancelled and the fine amount, if any paid by the petitioner shall be refunded to him. The said Compromise Petition dated 17.02.2020 shall form part of this order.

¶15

Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case stands allowed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. *Herein enclosed the xerox copy compromise Memo Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar av To 1. The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Vellore. 2. The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Vellore. 3.The Superintendent,Central prison, vellore +1cc to Mr.M.G.Ramachandiran , Advocate SR.No. 15494 Crl.R.C.No.308 of 2020 NRJK A.SK(25/02/2020)

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Ravikrishnan v. C.Kamalakannan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Ravikrishnan v. C.Kamalakannan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Panneer Selvam, 45 Yrs, Vs P. Priya

R.Gunasekaran Vs K.R.Venkatesan

S.Selvi Vs State Rep by

Anushree@Anunivetha Vs a.Venugopal

Velu @ Kolandaivel, Vs Minor Inbathmizh

Nesari Poo Vs State Represented by