S.Selvi v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of criminal revision petition and connected mental case. Court permitted withdrawal with liberty to approach competent authority and dismissed the matter as withdrawn. Connected mental case closed.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner permitted to withdraw criminal revision case with liberty to approach competent authority.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.02.2020 CORAM:
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Criminal Revision Case No.68 of 2020 & Crl.M.P.No.384 of 2020
S.Selvi : Petitioner/Defacto complainant
..vs..
State, Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, H-6 R.K.Nagar Police Station, Chennai 600 081 (Crime No.1580 of 2016) : Respondent/Complainant
Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 read with 401 Cr.P.C, to set-aside the order, dated 14.10.2019 passed in Crl.M.P.No.350 of 2018 in C.C.No.2244 of 2017 by the learned XV Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai, and to allow this Case.
For Petitioner : Mr. S.Anbazhgan For Respondent : Mr. Bharath Chakravarthy, Public Prosecutor (Puducherry) ---
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Revision Case with liberty to approach the competent authority or Court, as per law. The learned counsel has also made an endorsement in the Court bundle today to that effect.
- Recording the said submission and endorsement so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn, with the said liberty. Consequently, the connected Crl.MP is closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Selvi
- respondent
State
Coram
R.MAHADEVAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court