Allowed

Naveenatham v. the State Rep. by

Madras HC18 Mar 2020CRL OP/6211/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras granted anticipatory bail to Naveenamatham, an accused in a cheating case, considering the co-accused released and her gender. Bail granted with bond and sureties and standard reporting conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted in the event of arrest or appearance on conditions including bond execution, sureties, reporting to police, and refraining from tampering or absconding.

Naveenatham Vs the State Rep. by — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Eighteenth day of March Two Thousand Twenty

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.6211 of 2020

¶5

NAVEENATHAM [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]

¶6

¶7

THE STATE REP. BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO. 28 OF 2019

¶8

For Petitioner : M/S. S.PANNEER SELVAM Advocate

¶9

For Respondent : M/S.S.THANKIRA Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶10

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶11

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶12

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who is A3 in a criminal case registered in Crime No.28 of 2019 for the offence punishable under Section 420 of I.P.C.

¶13

The allegation is that the petitioner, who was working with the defacto-complainant in an Anganvaadi, used to borrow money from the defacto complainant and the repaid the same. While so, A1 (daughter of the petitioner), A-2, (Son-in-law of the petitioner), A4 (Son of the petitioner), had approached the defacto complainant and fraudulently borrowed a sum of Rs.25 lakhs from the defacto complainant by stating that if they deposit Rs.25 lakhs in the Bank, Rs.5 Crores will be credited in their account within one hour and thereby, they will repay the borrowed sum. However, they failed to repay the borrowed sum. Hence, the present complaint has been filed.

¶14

The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, would submit that, the main accused, namely, A1, A2 and A4 were arrested and released on bail.

¶15

Considering the nature of the allegation that only A1, A2 and A4 had approached the defacto complainant and received the money and they were already released on bail and also considering the fact that the petitioner being a lady, this Court is inclined to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tiruvannamalai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶18

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶19

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

¶20

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶21

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶22

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶23

-sd/-

¶24

18/03/2020

¶25

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶26

TRUE COPY

¶27

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶28

¶29

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, TIRUVANNAMALAI.

¶30

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUVANNAMALAI [FOR INFORMATION]

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶33

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.

¶34

+1 CC to M/S. S.PANNEER SELVAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.5319

¶35

CRL OP.6211/2020
Date :18/03/2020
cs 06/05/2020

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Naveenatham v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naveenatham v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Nandhakumar Vs The Chairman

S.Nagarajan Vs The Registrar

Manivel Vs The Inspector of Police

Sivakumar Vs State Rep.by

S.Dhanasekar Vs the Inspector of Police

D.Krishnamurthy Vs the Inspector of Police