Disposed

V.Aghilesh v. State Rep by

Madras HC8 Dec 2020CRL OP/19138/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court directed the police to issue a notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C for investigation into a pending criminal complaint. The petitioner was instructed to appear, and the Investigating Officer was directed to register an FIR or close the complaint within five days, with provisions for anticipatory bail application if arrest grounds exist.

What did the court decide?

Direction to police to issue notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C within 25 days for investigation; petitioner to appear.

V.Aghilesh Vs State Rep by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 08.12.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.19138 of 2020

¶6

V.Aghilesh .. Petitioner

¶7

Vs. The State represented by The Inspector of Police, W-27 All Women Police Station Vadapalani, Chennai Crime No.Not known/2020) .. Respondent

¶8

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.Not known of 2020 pending on the file of the respondent police.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Balaji For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R (The case has been heard through video conference)

¶10

The Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petition enquiry against the petitioner is pending in CSR No.150 of 2020 on the complaint of one Venkateswari.

¶11

The respondent police has to issue notice under Section 41A of Cr.P.C to the petitioner. The petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police and the Investigating Officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following the procedures therein. The Investigating Officer is to either register a First Information Report or close the complaint by 05.01.2021. If the Investigating Officer has grounds to arrest the petitioner, then he has to state the reasons in writing and communicate the same to the petitioner and in that case, the petitioner is at liberty to file necessary application before this Court seeking anticipatory bail.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

With this observation, this Criminal Original Petition is closed

¶14

-sd/-

¶15

08/12/2020

¶16

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
W-27,ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,
VADAPALANI, CHENNAI
+1CC to M/S.C.BALAJI Advocate on payment of necessary
charges SR NO.7991
CRL OP.19138/2020
Date :08/12/2020
MK:31/12/2020

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Aghilesh v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Aghilesh v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Ashok Vs the State Rep.by Its

Ramar (A-1) Vs the State by

Muthuvel Vs the State Rep by

Cherukur Mani Vs the State Rep by Its

Madhavan Vs the State Rep. by

Radhakrishnan Vs State Rep.by Its