Dismissed

R.Devasena v. State Rep. by

Madras HC15 Sept 2020CRL OP/14327/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed the petition seeking anticipatory bail pending a Section 41A Cr.P.C. inquiry. The court directed the police to issue a summons to the petitioner and conduct the inquiry, granting liberty to seek anticipatory bail if arrest grounds are subsequently established.

What did the court decide?

Order directed police to issue summons under Section 41A Cr.P.C. I.O. to register FIR or close complaint by 13.10.2020. Liberty to approach Court if arrest is grounded.

R.Devasena Vs State Rep. by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 15.09.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.14327 of 2020

¶6

R.Devasena

¶7

.. Petitioner

¶8

Vs.
STATE By
The Inspector of Police
J-6 Thiruvanmiyur Police Station
Chennai.
(Crime No. Not Known of 2020) ..Respondent

¶9

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of her arrest in Crime No.not known of 2020 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ponraj
For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz
Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶11

The Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petition enquiry against the petitioner is pending in C.S.R. No.238 of 2020 on the complaint of one Kumarasubramaniyan.

¶12

2.The respondent police has to issue notice under Section 41A of Cr.P.C to the petitioner. The petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police and the Investigating Officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following the procedures therein. The Investigating Officer is to either register a First Information Report or close the complaint by 13.10.2020. If the Investigating Officer has grounds to arrest the petitioner, then he has to state the reasons in writing and communicate the same to the petitioner and in that case, the petitioner is at liberty to file necessary application before this Court seeking anticipatory bail.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

With this observation, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

¶15

-sd/15/09/2020

¶16

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶17

TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
J-6, THIRUVANMIYUR POLICE STATION,
THIRUVANMIYUR,
CHENNAI.
CC to M/S. N.PONRAJ Advocate on payment of necessary charges
SR nO.
CRL OP.14327/2020
Date :15/09/2020
RD 21/09/2020

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Devasena v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Devasena v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vignesh Vs the State Rep by

Radhakrishnan Vs State Rep. by

Premkumar Vs State Rep. by

R.Radha Vs State Represented by

Magendiran Vs State Rep. by

K.Manikandan Vs State Rep.