Magendiran v. State Rep. by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in IPC and TN Property Act offences. Court dismissed petition as infructuous because petitioner was already arrested on 12.09.2020.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.09.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTIC E A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.O.P.No.13715 of 2020
and Crl.MP.No.5476 of 2020
Magendiran ... Petitioner
vs.
State rep. By ...Respondent
The Sub Inspector of Police,
Sipcot Police Station,
Vellore District.
Crime No.553/2020.
Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
to grant Anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the event of his
arrest in Crime No.553 2020 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Sankar For Respondent : Mr. M. Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor For intervenor : Mr.C.M.Anantha Kumar
ORDER
(The case has been heard through video conference)
The petitioner who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences publishable under Sections 143, 294 (b), 447, 427 and 506 (i) of IPC and Section 3 of Tamil Nadu Property (prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992 in Crime No.553 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
- When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ been arrested on 12.09.2020.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Magendiran
- respondent
State
Coram
E A.D.Jagadish Chandira
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court