Allowed

K.Manikandan v. State Rep.

Madras HC15 Sept 2020CRL OP/14309/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail petition under S.439 CrPC, the petitioner charged with illegally transporting gravel sand without a license sought release. The High Court granted bail conditional upon making a donation to the Chief Minister's Public Relief Fund, executing bail bonds, and adhering to strict reporting requirements.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail upon payment of Rs.15,000 donation and execution of bond with sureties, subject to strict reporting conditions.

K.Manikandan Vs State Rep. — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 15.09.2020

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶5

CRL.O.P.No.14309 of 2020

¶6

K.Manikandan

¶7

S/o.Karuppusamy ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The State Represented by Inspector of Police Mangalam Police Station, Tiruppur District.

¶10

Crime No.1319 of 2020 ... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.1319 of 2020 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Mangalam Police Station, Tiruppur District.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar
For Respondent : Mr.T.Shunmugarajeswaran
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
O R D E R
(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶13

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.08.2020 for the offences punishable under Section 379 IPC, in Crime No.1319 of 2020, seeks bail.

¶14

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had illegally transported two (2) units of gravel sand in a Tipper lorry, without any permit or valid license. Hence, the complaint.

¶15

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. On instruction, he would further submit that taking into consideration of the Covid pandemic situation, the petitioner without prejudice to his defence, is prepared to make considerable donation to any charitable Organization or Association, and that the petitioner has been suffering incarceration from 21.08.2020. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶16

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the petitioner had illegally transported two (2) units of gravel sand

¶17

in a Tipper lorry without any valid license or permit. Hence he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. He would further submit that the petitioner has no previous case.

¶18

5.In order to curb the illegal sand mining activities and taking into consideration the voluntary submission made by the petitioner offering to donate/pay considerable amount to any charitable organization or association this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner shall be directed to make a non refundable payment / donation for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) to the Joint Secretary & Treasurer, Chief Minister's Public Relief Fund, Finance (CMPRF) Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009, Tamil Nadu, India, e-mail: [email protected] or by Electronic Clearing System (ECS) to Indian Overseas Bank, Secretariat Branch, Chennai 600 009, S.B.Account No.11720 10000 00070, IFS Code IOBA0001172, CMPRF PAN: AAAGC0038F and on such payment and production of proof he shall be released on bail on his executing a own bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only), before the Superintendent of the concerned prison, in which the petitioner has been confined and thereafter on his release;

¶19

(a) the petitioner shall within a period of two weeks from the date of the commencement of the Court’s normal functioning, execute two sureties for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.IV, Tiruppur, failing which the bail granted by this Court shall stand dismissed automatically;

¶20

(b) Merely, because the petitioner deposits the said amount, it would not amount to admission of his guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.

¶21

(c) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter on every Monday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶22

(d) the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶23

(e) the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature;

¶24

(f) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶25

(g) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶26

(h) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW

¶27

5560];

¶28

(i) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶29

With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

¶30

-sd/-

¶31

15/09/2020

¶32

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶33

TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.IV, TIRUPPUR 2 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON,COIMBATORE 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶34

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANGALAM POLICE STATION, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT.

¶35

5 THE JOINT SECRETARY & TREASURER, CHIEF MINISTERS PUBLIC RELIEF FUND, FINANCE[CMPRF]DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU, SECRETARIAT,CHENNAI-600 009.,TAMILNADU,INDIA,

¶36

CC to M/S S.VINOTH KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶37

CRL OP.14309/2020 Date :15/09/2020 RD 16/09/2020

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Manikandan v. State Rep.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Manikandan v. State Rep.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vignesh Vs the State Rep by

Radhakrishnan Vs State Rep. by

Premkumar Vs State Rep. by

R.Radha Vs State Represented by

Magendiran Vs State Rep. by

R.Devasena Vs State Rep. by