Mohan v. the State Rep. by
Case brief
What is this about?
Crl.O.P. under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail. Petitioner absent. Court directed respondent to take necessary steps under law and listed for compliance.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.09.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.O.P.No.12322 of 2020
Mohan, M/48 years,
S/o.Rajamanickam,
No.5, Bajanai Koil Street, Sadayankadu, Vettaikaranirupu, Nagapattinam District. ... Petitioner/1st Accused
Vs. The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Vettaikaran Irupu Police Station, Nagapattinam District. Crime No. 575 of 2020. ... Respondent/Complainant
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent in Crime No. 575 of 2020, on the file of the respondent herein.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to exercise jurisdiction to order anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in the absence of counsel for the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mohan
- respondent
The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Vettaikaran Irupu Police Station
Coram
A.D.Jagadish Chandira
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court