Partly allowed

Ravi Kumar v. the State Rep by

Madras HC13 Aug 2020CRL MP/4845/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court modified a daily reporting condition imposed on the petitioner in a prior bail order, directing him to appear only on Mondays after the lockdown ends or the Court resumes normal functioning.

What did the court decide?

Condition of daily police reporting relaxed; petitioner directed to appear only on Mondays at 10.30 a.m. after lockdown ends or Court resumes normal functioning.

Ravi Kumar Vs the State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.08.2020

¶2

CORAM:

¶3

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶4

Crl.M.P.No.4845 of 2020

¶5

in Crl.O.P.No.4631 of 2020

¶6

Ravi Kumar

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The State by its Inspector of Police, K5-Peravallur Police Station, Chennai. (Crime No.41 of 2020) ... Respondent

¶9

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.4631 of 2020 dated 09.03.2020, the petitioner shall report before respondent police daily at 10.30 A.M., and 5.30 P.M., until further orders.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sasikumar

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.K.Prabakar

¶12

Additional Public Prosecutor

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶15

This petition has been filed to to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.4631 of 2020 dated 09.03.2020, the petitioner shall report before respondent police daily at 10.30 A.M., and 5.30 P.M., until further orders.

¶16

2 The counsel for the petitioner would submit that, as per the condition imposed by this court Crl.O.P.No.4631 of 2020 dated 09.03.2020, the petitioner has been complying with the conditions and hence, he seeks for relaxation of the condition imposed.

¶17

3 The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would also submit that the petitioner has been complying with the the condition regularly.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

4 In view of the above submission, the condition imposed as against the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.4631 of 2020 dated 09.03.2020 is modified. However, the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police, after lifting of the lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier, on every Monday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶20

5 With the above directions, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.

¶21

-sd/-

¶22

13/08/2020

¶23

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶24

TRUE COPY

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶26

¶27

1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K-5, PERAVALLUR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI

¶28

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶29

C.C. to M/S.S.SASIKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges

Order

CRL MP.4845/2020

CRL OP.4631/2020

Date :13/08/2020

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶37

MK:28/08/2020

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ravi Kumar v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Kumar v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gowdhaman Vs the State Represented by

Naveen Vs the Inspector of Police

Saravanan Vs the State Rep by

Saran Raj Vs the State Rep. by

C.Chinnakannu Vs State Rep by

B.Ranganathan Vs State by