Sasikala v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order granting bail to petitioner, requiring bond execution with one surety (parent) only, discharging the requirement for a second sovereign surety. Acknowledges parent has already executed the surety.
What did the court decide?
Order dated 27.11.2019 modified to allow release on bond executed by parent as sole surety for Rs.25,000/-; second surety requirement removed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.07.2020
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE. C.V.KARTHIKEYAN. J
Crl.M.P.No.4406 of 2020
and
Crl.O.P.No.31057 of 2019
Sasikala
...Petitioner / Accused 3
Vs.
State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Erode North Police Station, Erode District. Crime No.291 of 2019 ...Respondent/Complainant
Prayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to modify one of the condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety of the parent of the petitioner instead of to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties out of which, one surety shall be the parent of the petitioner and the other shall be the solvent surety, each for a like sum in the order passed in Crl.O.P.No31057 of 2019.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the condition to execute a bond with one solvent surety other than the parent should be removed so that only the parent is required to execute the bond.
Whether the petitioner is eligible for bail on execution of surety by the parent alone without requiring a second solvent surety.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sasikala
- respondent
State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Erode North Police Station
Coram
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court