R. Anvardeen, M/37 v. R. Jainulaptheen. M.Sc.
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 was closed as the petitioner had been reinstated to service via an order served on the respondent, removing the scope for the liability sought.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 15.07.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
CONT.P.No.566 of 2020
R.Anvardeen
.. Petitioner
Vs.
R.Jainulaptheen,
The Chief Executive Officer,
Tamil Nadu Wakf Board,
No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street,
Vallal Seethakadi Nagar,
Chennai - 600 001.
.. Respondent
Contempt petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts
Act 1971, to punish the respondent for the willful disobedience of the order
of this Court dated 11.02.2020 made in W.P.No.3270 of 2020.
For Petitioner : M/s.G.Pughazhenthi For Respondent : Mr.Mohammed Fiyaz Ali
ORDER
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Anvardeen
- respondent
R. Jainulaptheen
Coram
C.V. Karthikeyan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M/S.Nalli Chinnasami Chetty a Partnership firm registered Vs Sivakumar G.Nalli an Indian National and 2 others
M/s.Acme Commodities Pvt.Ltd. Vs The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and another
Viacom 18 Media Pvt.Ltd. Vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Followon Interactive Media Pvt.Ltd. Vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited