This court dismissed a writ petition questioning a refusal to regularize service. Courts held matter academic as most petitioners had retired except three who are still serving.
Impugned order quashed; service regularization and benefits ordered to be regularized from initial appointment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.12.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
W.P.No.24543 of 2007 and
M.P.Nos. 1 & 2 of 2007
Prayer: Petition filed praying to issue writ of Certiorarified Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction in the nature of writ calling for the records relating to the impugned order in C.NO.22849/2006 dated 25.04.2007 of the 1st respondent and quash the same and direct the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioners in the cadre of Havildar and Sub-Inspector of Police from the date of their initial appointment and grant all consequential service and monetary benefits.
For Petitioners : No Appearance
For Respondents 1to4 : Mr.K. Magesh
When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no reprsentation on behalf of the petitioners though the petitioners have filed this writ petition to issue writ of Certiorarified Madamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction in the natre of writ calling for the records relating to the impugned order in C.NO.22849/2009 dated 25.04.2007 of the 1st respondent and quash the same and direct the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioners in the cadre of Havildar and Sub-Inspector of Police from the date of their initial appointment and grant all consequential service and monetary benefits.
and got retirement from service, except the petitioners Nos.8, 10 and 12 who are to attain the age of superannuation on 31.08.2021, 31.03.2022 and 30.04.2022 respectively. In this regard, a communication has been received in ref No.A1/10573/2014 dated 17.12.2020 from Commandant, TSP IX Battalion Manimuthar, in reply to the Government Pleader vide letter dated 05.11.2020, mentioning the service details of the petitioners herein. The same has been produced before this Court. Therefore, nothing survives to adjudicate in this writ petition and the same may be dismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
lbm
To:
1. The Inspector of General of Police,
Armed Police, Kilpauk, Chennai -600 010.
2. The Deputy Inspector General of Police,
Armed Police, Kilpauk, Chennai -600 010.
3. Tamil Nadu Special Police, VII Battalion,
Tihar Jail, New Delhi.
4. Tamil Nadu Special Police IX Battalion,
Manimutharu, Tirunelveli District.
+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.42291
W.P.No.24543 of 2007
and
M.P.Nos. 1 & 2 of 2007
pa[co]
srg 01/02/2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioners entitled to regularization of service after attaining superannuation age?
K. Subbaiah
Inspector of General of Police
Deputy Inspector General of Police
Tamil Nadu Special Police, VII Battalion
Tamil Nadu Special Police IX Battalion
P. Velmurugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
