A Single Judge of the Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as no appearance was made by the petitioner despite multiple postings and the caption 'For Dismissal'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.12.2020 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
W.P.No.28176 of 2007
and
W.M.P.No.1 of 2007 M. Ranganathan ...Petitioner Vs 1. D. Kannabiran, 2. The Assistant Director/Surcharge Officer, Department of Silk Development, O/o. Silk Development, Ponnagaram, Salem District.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ or Order or Direction in the nature of a Writ calling for the records on the file of the 3rd relating to the order issued in C.T.A. No.2/2006 dated 26.04.2007 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents 1to3 : No Appearance ****** O R D E R
On the earlier occasions i.e.05.11.2020 and 01.12.2020, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was posted today, i.e.18.12.2020, under the caption “For Dismissal”. Despite the same, even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy// lbm Sub Assistant Registrar
Copy to:
W.P.No.28176 of 2007
and
W.M.P.No.1 of 2007
ca(CO)
rv(29/01/2021)
M. Ranganathan
D. Kannabiran
The Assistant Director/Surcharge Officer, Department of Silk Development
The Principal District and Sessions Court, Vellore District
P. Velmurugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
