The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Vs The Official Liquidator, (As a Liquidator of M/s. Sree Uma Parameswari Mills Ltd)

¶1

Comp.A.No.22 of 2020 in C.P.No.207 of 2003

¶2

Comp.A.No.22 of 2020 in C.P.No.207 of 2003

¶3

M.SUNDAR, J

¶4

Captioned application is with a prayer for 'condonation of delay' ['COD'].

¶5

Mr.M.Palanimuthu, learned counsel on record for applicant and

¶6

Mr.Bavisetty Sridhar, learned 'Deputy Official Liquidator' [hereinafter 'Deputy OL' for the sake of brevity] on behalf of the Official Liquidator attached to this Court [hereinafter 'OL' for the sake of brevity] are before me in this web hearing on a video conferencing platform.

¶7

Captioned application has been filed with a prayer to condone delay

¶8

in filing an application to set aside 08.05.2017 proceedings of OL made in Claim No.442/207/2003/Claim Team-III.

¶9

To be noted, learned counsel for applicant has since filed a better affidavit, this Court notices that the claim pertains to provident fund dues which ultimately go to the benefit of employees if the applicant succeeds on merits qua its claims.

¶10

M.SUNDAR. J

¶11

http://www.judis.nic.in 1/2

¶12

Comp.A.No.22 of 2020 in C.P.No.207 of 2003

¶13

mk

¶14

In this view of the matter, considering the submission of learned
counsel for applicant that simultaneous efforts for realization of provident
fund dues were being taken which has resulted in delay viewed in the light of
learned Deputy OL very fairly submitting that there is no
objection/opposition to COD prayer (without admitting or denying the
averments in the affidavit and better affidavit filed in support of captioned
application), captioned COD application stands allowed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
11.12.2020
mk
Comp.A.No.22 of 2020
in
C.P.No.207 of 2003

¶15

http://www.judis.nic.in 2/2

The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, v. The Official Liquidator, (As a Liquidator of M/s. Sree Uma Parameswari Mills Ltd)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, v. The Official Liquidator, (As a Liquidator of M/s. Sree Uma Parameswari Mills Ltd)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.K.Palani, S/o. Kannan, Vs M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd, Represented by its P.a.Holder

M/s Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd, Rep.by its Chief General Manager, Vs Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Jaipur(Third)

Kalavalli Vs the Executive Director

The Official Liquidator Vs

The Official Liquidator,High Court, Madras as the LIquidator of M/s. Ruby Rubber Works (Madras) Ltd. Vs nil

Mrs. Nithya, Representing as Proprietor of Star Security Services Vs The Official Liquidator, High Court of Madras