Mrs. Nithya, Representing as Proprietor of Star Security Services v. The Official Liquidator, High Court of Madras
Case brief
What is this about?
in C.P.No.291 of 2013 M.SUNDAR.J.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Comp.A.No.158 of 2020 in C.P.No.291 of 2013
M.SUNDAR.J.,
Mr.K.Jayaraman, learned counsel for applicant seeks permission to
withdraw captioned application, but submits that the rights of the applicant may please be preserved for taking out any other application with same/similar prayer, after impleading State Bank of India and / or
any other necessary party, as the learned Official Liquidator is now
taking the stand that the monies payable to the security agencies has to come from the Bank.
this plea in this proceedings and all questions are left open.
Captioned application dismissed as withdrawn albeit preserving the
rights of the applicant to take out any other application with same/similar
prayer after arraying State Bank of India and/or any other party as respondent.
11.12.2020
gpa
1/2
M.SUNDAR.J.,
gpa
Comp.A.No.158 of 2020 in
C.P.No.291 of 2013
11.12.2020
2/2
Mr. K. Jayaraman
M. Sundar J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court