V.Narasimhan v. v.Rangarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ( Civil…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fifth day of August Two Thousand Twenty PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN CMP No.12606 of 2018 in AS No.489 of 2018 V.NARASIMHAN [ PETITIONER ] Vs V.RANGARAJAN [ RESPONDENT ] Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to stay all further proceedings including Execution Proceedings in furtherance of the decree and judgment passed in OS.No.3902/2017 dt.12/03/2018 on the file of XV Additional City civil Judge, Chennai (in CMP.No.12606/2018) pending AS No.489 of 2018.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.M.RAMESH, Advocate for the petitioner and of respondent not appearing either in person or by an advocate the court made the following order:-
In this miscellaneous petition, an order of interim stay was granted on 14.03.2019 for a period of four weeks. Subsequently, by order dated 12.04.2019, the said interim order was extended till 06.06.2019. Thereafter, the same was not extended and the matter has been kept pending till date. Hence, this miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sub-Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. ) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT, CHENNAI.
C.C. to M/S.K.M.RAMESH Advocate on payment of necessary charges
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.NARASIMHAN
- respondent
V.RANGARAJAN
Coram
R. MAHADEVAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court