The Special Tahsildar v. Ravikulam(Deceased)
Case brief
What is this about?
Three miscellaneous petitions seeking stays on execution of acquisition judgments were closed by the High Court as they were pending without orders since 2016, and keeping them pending would serve no useful purpose.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Tuesday, the Fourth day of August Two Thousand Twenty PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN C.M.P.Nos.16438, 16439 and 16440 of 2016 in
Appeal Suit Nos.606, 607 and 608 of 2016
THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, [ PETITIONER IN ALL THE PETITIONS ] LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, R.C.SAIDAPERT CHENNAI-600 015
Vs 1.RAVIKUMAR (DECEASED) [ RESPONDENTS IN CMP.16438/16 IN AS.606/2016 ] 2.GOKULAM 3.MUNIAMMAL 4.ELLAMMAL 5.MATHIKULAM 6.BHARATHI 7.KUPPU MANICKAMMAL 8.S.INDIRA
9.S.MEKALA 10.S.MANGALA KUMAR 11.S.VASANTHA KUMAR 12.S.CHITHRAKALA 13.KALAMMAL 14.R.SIVALINGAM
15.SANTHI
16.THE DEFENCE ESTATES OFFICER MADRAS CIRCLE, CHENNAI – 600 009.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
The Special Tahsildar
- respondent
Ravikumar (Deceased)
- respondent
V.Komala
- respondent
R.Jaishankar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court