The single judge closed the compliance petition because the appellant failed to deposit the conditional interim stay amount within the specified period, triggering the automatic vacation clause.
The petition stands closed by virtue of the specific clause in the prior order dated 07.08.2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP.No.12543 of 2017 in CMA.No.2336 of 2017
CMP.No.12543 of 2017 in
CMA.No.2336 of 2017
R.MAHADEVAN, J.
This Court, by order dated 07.08.2017, granted an order of interim
stay on condition to deposit a sum of Rs.8,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs
only) out of the total award amount with proportionate interest and costs by
the appellant / Transport Corporation, within a period of six weeks. While
passing such order, it was specifically mentioned therein that in the event of failure on the part of the appellant to deposit the said amount within the specified period, the interim stay granted would stand automatically vacated
without any further reference to this Court.
learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the appellant has not complied with the aforesaid conditional order.
1/2
CMP.No.12543 of 2017 in CMA.No.2336 of 2017
R.MAHADEVAN, J.
av
specific clause in the order dated 07.08.2017 as stated in the paragraph No.1
of this order.
15.09.2020
av
CMP.No.12543 of 2017 in CMA.No.2336 of 2017
(2/3)
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R. MAHADEVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
