The Special Tahsildar v. Jayamani
Case brief
What is this about?
9864 in A.S.SR.Nos.61477, 61478 and 61479 of…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.9856, 9860 and 9864 in A.S.SR.Nos.61477, 61478 and 61479 of 2019
R.MAHADEVAN, J.
The learned counsel for the respondent in these petitions has no objection in condoning the delay. She has also filed a memo to that effect.
2.In view of the above, the delay of 1072 days in filing the above appeals, is condoned and these petitions are ordered accordingly.
3.Registry is directed to number and list the appeals on 21.09.2020, if the same are otherwise in order.
KM 14.09.2020
Coram
R.MAHADEVAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court