The Special Tahsildar v. Niranjana
Case brief
What is this about?
9863, 9866, 9870, 9872, 9876, 9877 and 9880…
What the court decided
C.M.P.Nos.9857, 9859, 9862, 9863, 9866, 9870, 9872, 9876, 9877 and 9880 of 2020 in A.S.SR.Nos.29461, 29463, 29458, 29457, 29460, 29456, 29455, 29459, 29462 and 29464 of 2019
R.MAHADEVAN, J.
The learned counsel for the respondent in these petitions has no objection in condoning the delay. She has also filed a memo to that effect.
2.In view of the above, the delay of 1092 days in filing the above appeals, is condoned and these petitions are ordered accordingly.
3.Registry is directed to number and list the appeals on 21.09.2020, if the same are otherwise in order.
KM 14.09.2020
Coram
R.MAHDEVAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court