The Project Director,National v. S.Nainammal
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed an appeal against an interim arbitral award confirming the lower court's order. The court upheld the award but directed the respondents to refund development charges, pay compensation for trees and crops, and allow interest/solatium per Supreme Court precedent.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed in favor of the respondents, who were directed to refund development charges, pay compensation for trees and crops, and grant solatium and interest.
What the court decided
CMA(MD). No.226 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Thirteenth day of February Two Thousand and Twenty
PRESENT
The Honble Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND The Honble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI
CMA(MD). No.226 of 2019
The Project Director, National Highways No.45-E & 220 National Highways Authority of India, Now at:
Plot No.1, Aishwaryam Heights, Indira Nagar, Sennamanaickenpatti (PO), Thadikombu Road, Dindigul - 624 004.
... Appellant
Vs
1 S.Nainammal, ... 1st Respondent
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Arbitration Tribunal's order dated 10.01.2018 in A.O.P.No.64 of 2015 requires confirmation by the High Court.
Whether additional compensation, development charges, and solatium are payable to the land loser in the arbitration.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India
- respondent
S.Nainammal
- respondent
The Special District Revenue Competent Authority for Land Acquisition
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court