Disposed

R.Ali, S/O Rahimansha, v. the District Treasury Officer

Madras HC18 Jul 2019WP(MD)/11435/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Common order in seven writ petitions challenging non-promotion. The court held that petitioners were already promoted to Superintendent in 2016. Any grievances regarding 2013 discrepancies or pari-passu issues with juniors were left open to be redressed separately; no further adjudication was required.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions disposed of with liberty to redress grievances regarding 2013 promotion discrepancies if they exist.

R.Ali, S/O Rahimansha, Vs the District… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 18.07.2019

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

W.P.(MD).Nos.11435, 11436, 11437, 11438, 11439, 11440 and 11441 of 2014 and

¶7

M.P.(MD)No.1,1,1,1,1,1 and 1 of 2014

¶8

W.P.(MD)No.11435 of 2015

¶9

R.Ali ... Petitioner -Vs-

¶10

1.The District Treasury Officer, District Treasury, Nagercoil, Kanyakumrai District.

¶11

2.The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, Chennai-15.

¶12

3.The Government of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Principal Secretary, Treasuries and Accounts Department, Chennai. ... Respondents

¶13

WP(MD)No.11436 OF 2014:

¶14

Lakshmi,

¶15

W/o. Selvaraj, 33, Periyasamy Konar Street, Ponnagaram, Madurai - 16, Working as Accountant, Sub Treasury, Nilakottai, Dindigul District.

¶16

... Petitioner

¶17

Vs. -

¶18

The District Treasury Officer, District Treasury, Dindigul District.

¶19

The Commissioner Of Treasuries and Accounts, Chennai 15

¶20

The Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Repd. by its Principal Secretary, Treasuries and Accounts Dept., Chennai

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

... Respondents

¶23

¶24

WP(MD)11437 OF 2017

¶25

G. Arunachalam

¶26

W/o. R.Meenatchinatha Pillai, D/o.T. Ganapathy,

¶27

79/10, Vanigar Street, Near Government Hr. Secondary School, Aralvaymoli, Kanyakumari District.

¶28

Working as Accountant, Distrit Treasury,

¶29

Nagercoil, Kanyakuamri District.

¶30

... Petitioner – Vs. - 1. The District Treasury Officer District Treasury,Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District. 2. The Commissioner Of Treasuries and Accounts, Chennai -15. 3.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by Principal Secretary, Treasuries and Accounts Dept., Chennai

¶31

... Respondents

¶32

WP(MD)NO.11438 OF 2014

¶33

N.S.Suresh,

¶34

S/o Nataraja Pillai, 19/14 South Car Street, Suchindram, Kanyakumari District. Working as Accountant, District Treasury, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

¶35

... Petitioner - Vs. - 1. The District Treasury Officer, District Treasury, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari Dist. 2. The Commissioner Of Treasuries and Accounts, Chennai 15 3. The Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Repd. by its Principal Secretary, Treasuries and Accounts Dept., Chennai ... Respondents

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶37

¶38

WP(MD)NO.11439 OF 2014

¶39

Chandra,

¶40

W/o. Suresh Roby, Palatrinkarai, Ammandivilai Post, Kanyakumari District, Working as Accountant, District Treasury, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

¶41

... Petitioner

¶42

The District Treasury Officer,

¶43

District Treasury, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari Dist.

¶44

The Commissioner Of Treasuries and Accounts, Chennai 15

¶45

The Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Repd. by its Principal Secretary, Treasuries and Accounts Dept., Chennai

¶46

... Respondents

¶47

WP(MD)No.11440 OF 2014

¶48

V.Kumar,

¶49

S/O. Velayutham

¶50

200 C.P.H. Road, Krishnan Kovil, Kanyakumari Dist.

¶51

Working as Accountant, District Treasury, Nagercoil,

¶52

Kanyakumari District. ... Petitioner

¶53

Vs. -

¶54

The District Treasury Officer,

¶55

District Treasury, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari Dist.

¶56

The Commissioner Of Treasuries and Accounts, Chennai 15

¶57

The Govt. of Tamil Nadu,

¶58

Repd. by its Principal Secretary, Treasuries and Accounts Dept., Chennai ... Respondents

¶59

WP(MD)No.11441 OF 2014

¶60

Valarmathi,

¶61

W/o Murugesan Palatrinkarai, Ammandivilai Post,

¶62

K.K. Dist. Working as Accountant,

¶63

District Treasury, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari Dist. ... Petitioner https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶64

¶65

Vs. -

¶66

The District Treasury Officer,

¶67

District Treasury, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari Dist.

¶68

The Commissioner Of Treasuries and Accounts, Chennai 15

¶69

The Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Repd. by its Principal Secretary, Treasuries and Accounts Dept., Chennai

¶70

Common Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to give promotion to the petitioner to the post of Accountant with effect from the date when it was due retrospectively and thereby include his name in the appropriate place in the panel of Accountant for promotion to the post of Superintendent for the year 2013-2014 with all consequential service and Monetary benefits.

¶71

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Kannan

¶72

For Respondents : Mr.M.Jeyakumar

¶73

Additional Government Pleader

¶74

COMMON ORDER

¶75

All these writ petitioners have filed these writ petitions claiming promotion to the post of Superintendent in the Department of Treasuries and Accounts.

¶76

2.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioners fairly made a submission that all these writ petitioners were already promoted to the post of Superintendent during the year 2016 and now, they are working as Superintendent. However, there are certain discrepancies in the matter of grant of promotion during the year 2013 and the writ petitioners have to redress their grievances in the matter of seeking promotions on par with their juniors if they have already been promoted. This Court is of the considered opinion that if at all any such grievances exist with

¶77

reference to particular junior or otherwise, it is left open to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ writ petitioners to redress the same in the manner known to law.

¶78

¶79

However, the writ petitioners have already been promoted to the post of Superintendents and now working and therefore, no further adjudication is required in these writ petitions.

¶80

3.Accordingly, these writ petitions stand disposed of with liberty to redress their grievances in the manner known to law, if the grievances exist. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶81

Assistant Registrar // True Copy //

¶82

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS )

¶83

sji/am

¶84

¶85

1.The District Treasury Officer, District Treasury, Nagercoil, Kanyakumrai District.

¶86

2.The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, Chennai-15.

¶87

3.The Government of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Principal Secretary, Treasuries and Accounts Department, Chennai.

¶88

1CC TO THE GOVT PLEADER SR 76292

¶89

5P 5C

¶90

W.P.(MD).Nos.11435, 11436, 11437, 11438, 11439, 11440 and 11441 of 2014 18.07.2019

¶91

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Ali, S/O Rahimansha, v. the District Treasury Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Ali, S/O Rahimansha, v. the District Treasury Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.M.Arunachalam, Vs Manonmaniam Sundaranar

Matheeeswaran, Vs the District Collector

Mariammal Vs the District Collector

S.Thangiah, Vs the District Elementary

Mr.G.Henry Bala Singh, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Pushpalatha Vs the Principal Accountant