Dismissed

K.R.L.Suguna Narashiman v. The Commissioner

Madras HC25 Jun 2019WP/9023/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to approach the civil court by way of revision under Section 21 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act 1959, the court recording the endorsement.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to resort to alternative remedy under Section 21 of T.N. Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959.

K.R.L.Suguna Narashiman Vs The Commissioner — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 25.06.2019

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

¶6

W.P. No.9023 of 2018
and
W.M.P. No.10876 of 2018
K.R.L.Suguna Narashiman ... Petitioner
-vs-
1.The Commissioner,
Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious
Charitable and Endowment (Admn) Dept,
Uthamar Gandhi Salai,
Nungambakkam, Chennai.
2.The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer,
Arulmigu Kapaleeswarar Temple,
Mylapore, Chennai -4. ... Respondents

¶7

Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records leading to the impugned proceedings of the 2^nd respondent in Na.Ka. No.12/2017/AA4 dated 27.02.2108 and quash the same.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mrs.S.Sathya For Respondents : Mr.M.Maharaja, Special Government Pleader

¶9

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶10

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

When it is pointed out by the Learned Special Government

¶13

Pleader appearing for the Respondents that the order impugned in the Writ Petition has been passed in pursuance of the directions issued by this Court in P. Lakshmanan -vs- Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District (Order dated 12.02.2018 in W.P. (MD) No. 14428 of 2017) and that the Petitioner has got an effective alternative remedy to challenge the same by way of revision under Section 21 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to resort to the same and he has made an endorsement to that effect, which is recorded.

¶14

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting such liberty. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No Costs.

25.06.2019

rkp

Index: Yes / No

Note: Issue order copy by 26.07.2019.

¶19

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶20

¶21

¶22

1.The Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious Charitable and Endowment (Admn) Dept, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai.

¶23

2.The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer, Arulmigu Kapaleeswarar Temple, Mylapore, Chennai -4.

¶24

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶25

¶26

P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J.

rkp

W.P. No.9023 of 2018

25.06.2019

http://www.judis.nic.in

K.R.L.Suguna Narashiman v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.R.L.Suguna Narashiman v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Selvam, Vs The Regional Passport Officer

Raghuraman Girija Vs Unio of India

M/s.Aviation Express Vs The Chairman

S.Mathaiyan Vs The Managing Director

M/s.Jeppiaar Educational Trust Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Loganathan Vs The Collector