Disposed

S.Selvam, v. The Regional Passport Officer

Madras HC24 Jun 2019WP/3921/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court recorded submissions in a writ petition challenging the closure of a passport application due to an adverse police report. The Respondent clarified that the file cannot be reopened under the Passport Seva Project but advised filing a fresh application with a penalty fee. The Court directed the Respondent to consider the fresh application once submitted.

What did the court decide?

The matter was left open for the Petitioner to file a fresh Passport application; the Respondent was directed to consider the same.

S.Selvam, Vs The Regional Passport Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 24.06.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

W.P. No.3921 of 2018

S.Selvam

..Petitioner

The Regional Passport Officer, Office of The Regional Passport Officer, Corporation Commercial Complex,

¶10

Opp. Thandumariamman Koil, Avinashi Road, Coimbatore - 641 018. .. Respondent

¶11

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order of the Respondent dated 24.03.2017 in letter Ref. No.FCL/305253691/17 and quash the same and consequently direct the Respondent to forthwith issue the Passport to the Petitioner based on his Application dated 31.01.2017.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr. K.Selvaraj For Respondent : Mr.T.V.Krishnamachari, Senior Panel Counsel O R D E R

¶13

This Court during the earlier hearing on 10.06.2019 has passed the following order:

¶14

"The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that before passing the impugned order, the Petitioner was required to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- as penalty for considering his application. Though the Petitioner was prepared to pay the same, the Respondent had not received it and instead issued the impugned order and treated the file as closed. The Respondent had directed the Petitioner to file an application after the criminal case was over. The Counter

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

Affidavit does state anything regarding the penalty, which the Petitioner was prepared to pay. The Respondent shall appear and specifically inform as to whether the Petitioner can pay the penalty at this stage for re-opening the application for passport.

¶17

Post the matter on 24.06.2019"

¶18

In furtherance to the aforesaid order, Mr. S. Hemanathan, Assistant Passport Officer, Coimbatore is present today and he has also filed a memo dated 24.06.2019, in which it has been stated as follows:

¶19

"I humbly submit that the petitioner application has been closed under the Passport Act 1967, Rule 10 (3) (b) due to adverse Police report received from the Superintendent of Police, Namakkal District vide File No.CB1069937447517 dated 27.2.2017. Once a file has been closed, we could not open the same file again in Passport Seva Project (PSP). The Petitioner is advised to submit a fresh Passport Application form by quoting the closed file details with necessary documents and penalty fee of Rs.5,000/-. We will refer the particulars to the Superintendent of Police, Namakkal to ascertain the stage of the case and also to get No objection for granting Passport facilities to the Petitioner. On receipt of clear Police verification report from the Superintendent of Police, Namakkal, the Passport will be issued to the Petitioner under the Passport Act, 1967."

¶20

Recording the aforesaid memo filed by the Respondent, it is left open to the Petitioner to make a fresh Application for Passport and the Respondent shall consider the same in accordance with law as stated in the aforesaid memo.

¶21

The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner will appear before the Respondent for making a fresh application on 03.07.2019 and the said statement is recorded.

¶22

//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

rkp

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

¶26

The Regional Passport Officer, Office of The Regional Passport Officer, Corporation Commercial Complex, Opp. Thandumariamman Koil, Avinashi Road, Coimbatore - 641 018.

¶27

+1cc to Mr.K.Selvaraj, Advocate, S.R.No.52145 +1cc to T.V.Krishnamachari, Advocate, S.R.No.52146

¶28

W.P. No. 3921 of 2018
PA(CO)
RRS(27/06/2019)

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Selvam, v. The Regional Passport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Selvam, v. The Regional Passport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Sakthivel Pandian Vs The State Information Commissioner

S.Muthukrishnan, Vs Inspector General of Registration

B.deva Vs The District Collector

Raghuraman Girija Vs Unio of India

M/s.Aviation Express Vs The Chairman

Il & Fs Tamil Nadu Power Vs Reserve Bank Of India