Loganathan v. The Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The Writ Petition filed under Article 226 seeking cancellation and ratification of Patta was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the hearing dates.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 25.06.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. No.8813 of 2018 and
W.M.P. No.10684 of 2018
Loganathan .. Petitioner
..Vs..
1. The Collector,
Kancheepuram District,
Kancheepuram.
2. The Tahsildar,
Chengalpattu Taluk,
Kancheepuram District.
3. M.Settu Arulappan
4. M.Thirunavukkarasu @ Anthony Raj .. Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 & 2 to cancel/ratify the Patta issued in the name of Parasan and Murugesan @ Murugan and to grant new Patta pertaining to the extent of land measuring 15 cents each in Survey No.227/7b and 277/7B1 at Nedungundram Village, Chengalpattu Taluk, Kancheepuram District.
For Petitioner : No appearance
When the Writ Petition was taken for hearing on 17.06.2019, there was no representation for the Petitioner. Hence, the matter is posted today, i.e. on 25.06.2019, under the caption “For Dismissal”.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Loganathan
- respondent
Collector, Kancheepuram District
- respondent
Tahsildar, Chengalpattu Taluk
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court