In a writ petition seeking quashing of a Labour Court order reinstiting the petitioner, the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the petitioner had already attained superannuation.
None. The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.10.2019
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.34573 of 2004
P. Jayaraman ... Petitioner
-Vs-
For Petitioner : Mr. R. Ganesan For Respondents : Mr. L.P. Shanmugasundaram, Special Government Pleader (Co.op) ORDER
The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the second respondent made in complaint No.1/2003 (Continuation Complaint No.82/84) Labour Court, Coimbatore, dated 25.3.2004 and to quash the same.
Rj
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Special Officer,
Swarnapuri Co-operative Stores Ltd.,
Swarnapuri,
Salem
2. The Presiding Officer,
Labour Court, Salem.
+1cc to the Govt.Pleader, Vide Sr.No.88772/19
W.P.No.34573 of 2004
Kak(20/11/2019)
P. Jayaraman
The Special Officer, Swarnapuri Co-operative Stores Ltd.
The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem
M. DURAISWAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
