K. Duraisamy v. the Registrar of
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed the Writ Petitions as infructuous upon the petitioners tendering an endorsement stating that the relief sought had become infructuous.
What did the court decide?
The Writ Petitions were dismissed as infructuous with no costs awarded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.10.2019
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.Nos.27781 & 27782 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2008
K.Duraisamy . Petitioner in W.P.No.27781/2008 S.Minavathy . Petitioner in W.P.No.27782/2008
Vs. 1.The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, EVR Periyar Road, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010. 2.The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Coimbatore – 2. 3.The Special Officer, The Coimbatore City Co-operative Bank Ltd., 119, Dr.Nantappa Road, Coimbatore – 18. .. Respondents in both the W.Ps
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records from the 2nd respondent relating to the impugned order dated 30.06.2008 in the Revision Petition Nos.9563/2007/nt4 and 8169/2007/nt4 and quash the same and direct the 3rd respondent to follow the rule of reservation for SC/ST employees in promotion as directed by the Joint Registrar in his order dated 29.12.2007.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ravi (in both W.Ps.) For Respondents: Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram, (in both W.Ps.) Special Government Pleader (Co-op) (R1 & R2) R3 – no appearance
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Duraisamy
- petitioner
S.Minavathy
- respondent
The Registrar of Co-operative Societies
- respondent
The Joint Registrar
- respondent
The Special Officer
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court