S.Shanmugam v. K.Kannapiran
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses a Civil Revision Petition as abated, noting the sole respondent had died and no legal representatives were impleaded.
What did the court decide?
C.R.P. dismissed as abated; connected M.P. closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.10.2019
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
C.R.P.No.3307 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 S.Shanmugam ... Petitioner Vs. K.Kannapiran ... Respondent Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated 08.06.2010 made in E.P.No.90 if 2008 in O.S.No.77 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kangayam.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Manokaran
For Respondent : Respondent Died
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the sole respondent had died long back and that no steps have been taken to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole respondent.
2.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Shanmugam
- respondent
K.Kannapiran
Coram
M.Duraiswamy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court