This order dismisses a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as infructuous, where the petitioner's counsel acknowledged that the relief sought had become unfeasible due to subsequent developments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.11.2019
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY
W.P. No.32806 of 2004
T.Muthusamy ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Dharmapuri.
2.The Thasildar,
Palacode,
Dharmapuri District. ... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari,
calling for the records of the 1 st respondent in his proceedings
No.2246/04/A3 dated 14.10.2004 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Shahul Hameed
For Respondents : Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy
Government Advocate
O R D E R
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous and also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)
// True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mkn
To
NR(CO)
CSR(10/12/2019)
W.P. No.32806 of 2004
T.Muthusamy
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmapuri
The Thasildar, Palacode, Dharmapuri District
M. Duraismamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
