Dismissed

S.Prabhakar v. The Regional Director

Madras HC13 Sept 2019WP/27292/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought directions to cancel banking permissions of various financiers for alleged unlawful loan recovery methods. The court observed that general directions would not suffice in the absence of specific material evidence and noted the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one later.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition if the necessity arises.

S.Prabhakar Vs The Regional Director — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 13.09.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

¶5

W.P. No. 27292 of 2019

¶6

S. Prabhakar ... Petitioner

¶7

-vs-

¶8

The Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India, Fort Glacis, 16, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001. 2. Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Room No. 508, 5^th Floor, A Wing, Sastri Bhavan, Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi - 110 001.

¶9

The District Collector, Office of District Collector, Kanchipuram - 631 501. Kanchipuram District.

¶10

The Managing Director, Mr. Aditya Puri, HDFC Bank Limited, HDFC Bank House, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel (West), Mumbai - 400 132.

¶11

The Manager, HDB Financial Services Limited, Branch Office at MNO Complex, Greams Road, Thousand Lights, Chennai - 600 006. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to consider the representation made by the Petitioner to the Respondents on 30.08.2019 requesting to take action on the Non Banking Finance Companies and Banks and private financier and authorized chit fund which are carrying out unlawful methods to recover the loan amount from the public

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

and take action to cancel their banking permission on the ground of violating RBI rules and regulation.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr. P. Kalimuthu For Respondents : Mr. R. Venkatesh, Government Advocate (for R3)

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

On a perusal of the affidavit filed in support of the Writ petition and the documents produced in support thereof, it is seen that it would not suffice to grant any general directions as sought by the Petitioner. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file fresh Writ Petition, if the necessity arises, seeking appropriate reliefs against the concerned persons by producing relevant materials in support of such claim and he has made an endorsement to that effect, which is recorded.

¶18

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn granting such liberty. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India,
Fort Glacis, 16, Rajaji Salai,
Chennai - 600 001.

¶19

The Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Room No. 508, 5^th Floor, A Wing, Sastri Bhavan, Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi - 110 001.

¶20

The District Collector, Office of District Collector, Kanchipuram - 631 501. Kanchipuram District.

¶21

AKM/24.09.19/2P-4C / W.P.No.27292 of 2019

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Prabhakar v. The Regional Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Prabhakar v. The Regional Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.Kopperumdevi, Vs The Appropriate Authority

D.Manoharan, Vs The Registrar of Societies

V.Selvi Vs The District Collector

K.Mohan Vs The Managing Director

K.S.haji Mohamed Vs the District Collector

V.Paramasivam Vs The Joint Commissioner