K.Mohan v. The Managing Director
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2019 in W.P. No. 22617 of 2019 W.M.P. No.…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.M.P. No. 25969 of 2019 in W.P. No. 22617 of 2019
W.M.P. No. 25969 of 2019 in W.P. No. 22617 of 2019
P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.
In view of the submission made by the Learned Counsel for the
Respondents during the earlier hearing on 01.08.2019, the Proposed
Respondent is necessary party for effectual adjudication of the Writ
Petition.
This Petition is ordered.
13.09.2019
kv 1/2
1/2
W.M.P. No. 25969 of 2019 in W.P. No. 22617 of 2019
P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.
kv
W.M.P. No. 25969 of 2019
in
W.P. No. 22617 of 2019
Dated : 13.09.2019
2/2
Coram
P.D. AUDIKESVALU
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court