Dismissed
Mr. a.Aathavan @ Arumugam v. The State of Tamil Nadu
Madras HCWP/22841/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 16/7/2019
C O R A M
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Writ Petition No.22841 of 2017
A.Aathavan @ Arumugan ... Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. By its Secretary to Government Secretariat Fort St. George Chennai 600 009. 2. The District Collector Collector Office Namakkal District. ... Respondents
Prayer Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation, dated 9/2/2016, to implement G.O.Ms.No.16, dated 8/1/2016 that the new Kumarapalayam Taluk is formed after quarter at Pallipalayam and to initiate viable steps to establish Taluk Office.
For petitioner ... No appearance For respondents ... Mr.E.Manoharan Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by S.Manikumar,J) Petitioner has sought for a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents, to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 9/2/2016.
2. On 15/7/2019, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, we recorded as hereunder:-
“No representation for the petitioner. Post on 16/7/2019, in the motion list.”
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Aathavan @ Arumugan
The State of Tamil Nadu
The District Collector
S. Manikumar
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court