Writ petition seeking quashing of an order regarding electricity service connection and a corresponding miscellaneous petition were disposed of by the High Court at Madras for non-prosecution as no representation appeared on behalf of the petitioner at the hearing.
Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 26.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P. 21877 of 2019 and W.M.P. 21091 of 2019
K.Kandasamy ... Petitioner Vs
For Petitioner : No appearance
ORDER
When the above Writ Petition was posted for hearing on
25.07.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner and
hence, the matter was posted today “for dismissal”. Even
today, (26.07.2019) there is no representation on behalf of the
petitioner either in person or through the counsel on record.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
costs. Consequently, the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition
is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Executive Engineer (O&M),
TANGEDCO, Pa.Velur – 638 182,
Namakkal District.
2. The Assistant Engineer (O&M),
Rural, TANGEDCO,
Valaiyapatti Road, Kabilarmalai,
Namakkal District.
+1 cc to M/s.C.Prakasam,Advocate Sr.No.64585
W.P. 21877 of 2019
and W.M.P. 21091 of 2019
AKM/ 28.08.19/ 2P- 4c /
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Kandasamy
The Executive Engineer (O&M), TANGEDCO, Namakkal District
The Assistant Engineer (O&M), Rural, TANGEDCO, Namakkal District
Mr. Justice M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
